Issues over arrangements for our children are, by their very nature, emotionally charged proceedings. Our barristers understand the importance of the outcome in these proceedings and recognize that family court judgements have a very real effect on lives.
Financial divorce can be acrimonious and the finances at stake can quite often be swallowed up in legal fees. Our lawyers seek to find a sensible conclusion within the shortest possible timeframe in order to achieve a fair and sensible resolution.
Family issues covered include:
Children – Contact and Residence Finance – Ancillary relief, Civil partnerships, Co-habitee, CSA payments, Inheritance claims, Maintenance, Married couples, TOLATA
We charge fixed fees, which means that we will charge you a set amount of money for the work. Below we provide estimates based on the ranges of fixed fees for barristers at Quartz Barristers Chambers. All fees include VAT (where applicable), each barrister profile states if they are VAT registered.
The fixed fees may vary depending on your needs – for example, your fees may be towards the higher end of the range if you need a more experienced barrister and/or you have a more complex case. If you have a particularly complex case, your fees may also be higher than the estimates below.
There are also likely to be additional costs for time spent in correspondence via telephone/video conferences or drafting documents. The cost will be fixed and agreed in advance based upon the barrister’s hourly rate as stated on their profile.
An indication of our range of typical fixed fees are listed below:
|Stage of Case||Ranges of fixed fees (estimates)|
|Written Advice||£250 – £750|
|Drafting Court Application –||£250 – £750|
|Drafting Statement||£500 – £1500|
|Review of Statement||£250 – £500|
|First court hearing (to see if the parties can agree)||£350 – £750|
|Directions Hearing (If parties cannot agree, to arrange final hearing)||£350 – £1000|
|Interim Hearing (In some cases it may be necessary to, for example, decie whether a child should have contact with a parent before the final hearing)||£350 – £1250|
|Pre-hearing review (to ensure the case is ready for the final hearing)||£350 – £1250|
|First day of final hearing||£1000 – £3000|
|Court appearances per day, after the first day of the final hearing||£500 – £1500|
|Stage of Case||Ranges of fixed fees (estimate)|
|Written advice on your financial dispute||£500 – £1500|
|Advising in face to face conference||£350 – £1000|
|Advising by telephone/video conference||£350 – £750|
|Drafting of any court documents such as Form E, Questionnaire||£350 – £1500|
|Drafting statement||£500 – £1500|
|First directions appointment (first court hearing exchanging financial information)||£400 – £1500|
|Financial dispute resolution hearing (second court hearing to reach a financial settlement)||£500 – £2500|
|First day of final hearing (if no settlement was reached in the FDR)||£1000 – £3000|
|Court appearances per day, after the first day of the hearing||£500 – £1500|
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane has issued new guidance in the forms of Orders in Children Cases for Judicial and practitioners information. The present regime has been governed by Practice Direction PD12B paragraph 14.13 which was issued on 6th June 2018. This Practice Direction said that all orders should should record19th June 2019
Represented a father who is desperate to have contact with his children. He has the added difficulties of not being an English speaker, having had to leave the family home (with nowhere to go) and his immigration status is “precarious”. This is the first application he is submitting to the court for a child arrangements2nd May 2019
The case involved allegations of substantial property and business assets both in the U.K. and held abroad by the otherside who maintained that they had very little in the way of assets and in the course of the proceedings even went as far as to claim bankruptcy. The client had tried her best as a2nd May 2019
The client’s only significant asset was a business which employed over 20 people. The business was struggling but notwithstanding the reality of the situation the otherside believed that the business was far more successful than it appeared from the accounts. The otherside had subjected the client to numerous requests for information relating to the business2nd May 2019
The client had lost confidence in his solicitor who had represented him at an FDA and FDR. The matter had been listed for trial and the client required direct access Counsel to represent him at trial. The matter was successfully compromised on the day of the final hearing. The work involved representing the client at2nd May 2019
The magnetic features of the case was the length of the marriage and the needs of the client and the parties children. The case was complicated over issues concerning the value of the former family home which had suffered from subsidence. The client sought the lion’s share of the matrimonial assets in order to meet2nd May 2019
The significant asset in the case was substantial pension assets. The parties had been married a long time and the client sought equality of pension income upon retirement. An actuary was required to carry out certain calculations. The client achieved her desired result at an FDR. The work involved consisted of representing the client at2nd May 2019
This case involved over 2 million pounds of assets however it was not complicated. The assets consisted of the former matrimonial home and several investment properties. Notwithstanding the lack of complication the parties had each spent the best part of £100,000 in legal costs prior to the issue of proceedings. The client had lost confidence2nd May 2019